Mission Bay Kohimarama Residents Association
  • About
    • Documents
    • Local History >
      • Historical Articles
    • Street names
    • Local photos
    • We need your help
  • Events
    • Events calendar
  • Projects
    • Mission Bay bowling club land
    • Zoning changes
    • AT safety proposals
    • Mission Bay 8 storey development
    • Meadowbank to Kohimarama Shared Path
    • Selwyn Reserve noise issues
    • Ryman Retirement Village Kohimarama Rd
  • Membership
    • Become a member
  • News
  • Contact
    • Links

Mission Bay development

Picture
We have been fighting a proposal to build a complex of up to 8 storeys and 28m high on the corner of Tamaki Drive and Patteson Ave.  This is completely out of line with the Unitary Plan rules which envision 4 storeys or 16 m height, and it is also totally inappropriate for the Mission Bay environment.

We won!!!

15/10/2021

0 Comments

 
We won!!!

We are thrilled to report that that the Environment Court decision on the Mission Bay development appeal has just been released and it has been declined in full. The proposed 8 storey development will not be built, and the developer will have to go back to the drawing board. Hopefully any future plans will be designed to complement the local environment.


The decision takes a much harder line against the development than we had anticipated, basically saying that the developer was simply trying to maximise their development at the expense of the community and residents, and that the court saw no reason to grant any additional height over that set out in the Unitary Plan rules.

In fact, they indicated that a generous 4 stories was the anticipated height for the area, and that even 5 stories would have to demonstrate some benefit to the community. This is a much firmer line than the impression we gained in court, and makes it clear that developers cannot just consider the Unitary Plan rules as a starting point for negotiations.

So, a comprehensive win.

This is a win for our community, but it is also a win for Auckland more generally as it provides some more common sense guidance as to how the Unitary Plan should be interpreted in future scenarios. Many of us were really disturbed that while the Unitary Plan appeared to set out clear rules, it turned out that these rules were not absolute and that lawyers could argue that pretty much anything could be approved. Even a 28m high building when the rules were for 18m! Fortunately, this decision reaffirms that the rules do have meaning, and while they can be exceeded in some circumstances, they can only be exceeded when there is clear community benefit to justify the breach.

This case has now established this principle in case law and will guide the assessment of breaches in all future resource consent applications.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Project drawings
    Revised proposal 1 June 2021
    Revised photo montages 1 June
    ​Revised proposal Sept 2020

    Submissions to Hearings
    ​Gill Chapell - Legal
    David Wren - Planning
    Don Stock - written evidence​
    Don Stock - graphics
    Support Mission Bay graphics​​
    All evidence - Council website

    Hearing Decision
    Decision document
    ​

    Archives

    October 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    October 2020
    May 2020
    February 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

  • About
    • Documents
    • Local History >
      • Historical Articles
    • Street names
    • Local photos
    • We need your help
  • Events
    • Events calendar
  • Projects
    • Mission Bay bowling club land
    • Zoning changes
    • AT safety proposals
    • Mission Bay 8 storey development
    • Meadowbank to Kohimarama Shared Path
    • Selwyn Reserve noise issues
    • Ryman Retirement Village Kohimarama Rd
  • Membership
    • Become a member
  • News
  • Contact
    • Links